Microsoft word - 2012 testimony in support of hb1274 abortion inducing drugs safety act.doc
Testimony of Missouri Right to Life
In Support of HB 1274
Before the House
Health Care Policy Committee
February 1, 2012
TESTIMONY OF MISSOURI RIGHT TO LIFE IN SUPPORT OF HB 1274
House Bill 1274 places restrictions on abortion-inducing drugs.
HB 1274 particularly focuses on the the abortifacient drug RU-486. It does not include
any prescriptions for drugs that do not have the effect of killing an already-created human being.
The bill clearly focuses on the protection of women by assuring that “no person who is not a
physician shall knowingly prescribe or administer RU-486 (mifepristone) or any other drug for
the purpose of inducing an abortion. It does not attempt to make an abortifacient illegal
Now, the abortionists, especially Planned Parenthood, will no doubt take issue with “any
other drug” but HB 1274 is specific in that it clarifies that “any other drug” means any drug that
is used for the purpose of inducing an abortion. The abortion industry, which profits from
abortions, distort the meaning of the terms, “pregnancy” and “abortion causing drugs.” They will
say that “pregnancy” starts only with implantation, not fertilization. But preventing implantation
By the time a human being is ready for implantation, a week of development has
occurred. The human being is composed of approximately 200 cells, and specialization into
different types of body systems has already begun. The human is long past the stage of being a
so-called “fertilized egg.” If denied the ability to implant, then the human cannot form a placenta
and continue to live. This means that a drug that prevents implantation causes an abortion.
The abortion drug, RU-486, which is now called, “mifepristone” and is marketed under
the brand name, “Mifeprex,” is an abortion causing drug and is used with a companion drug.
Mifeprex kills the unborn child, but it must be used with a second drug that induces contractions
to expel the unborn child’s body. In the United States, the second drug is misoprostol, marketed
under the trade name “Cytotec”. The FDA tells women to visit an abortion clinic or doctor’s
office two days after taking Mifeprex to be examined and to take misoprostol (Cytotec). (FDA,
“Mifepristone (Mifeprex) Medical Guide,” 2000). However, Planned Parenthood, claiming that
“It is generally common for a large majority of clinicians in the U.S. to follow evidence-based
alternatives to FDA regimens,” now claims that the “mifepristone regimen is often adapted” to
eliminate some of the FDA’s recommended steps. (Planned Parenthood, “Mifepristone:
Expanding Women’s Options for Early Abortion,”
abortion-mifepriestone.xml, visited 2/27/2007.) Planned Parenthood used to just tell women to
skip the second clinic visit and “self-administer the prostaglandin at home.” (Planned
Parenthood, “Mifepristone: Expanding Women’s Options for Early Abortion,”
abortion-mifepristone.xml, visit 2/11/2006.) Apparently, its exposure to liability for women’s
deaths, including those to be mentioned shortly, has caused it to be more ambiguous in how it
Cytotec is only approved by the FDA as a treatment for ulcers. Its manufacturer has even
sent a letter warning physicians and pharmacists that it should not be used by pregnant women.
Nevertheless, it continues to be used with Mifeprex.
The administration of Mifeprex followed by Cytotec has been implicated in the deaths of
at least four women in the state of California in recent years. A teenager, Holly Patterson, died in
September, 2003. In November, 2005, the New York Times reported that since Ms. Patterson’s
death, three more California women have died after using Mifeprex. (“Deaths after Abortion Pill
to Be Studied by Officials,” New York Times, November 23, 2005,
8b&ei=5070,accessed on 2/11/2006.) The Times article also reported that perhaps the vaginal
self-administration of Cytotec caused the type of infection that led to the women’s death.
Planned Parenthood has accused pro-life officials of getting the facts wrong about the
administration of Mifeprex in connection with the conscience rights of pharmacists. It says that
Mifeprex is not dispensed by pharmacists. Planned Parenthood misses the point. It is the entire
protocol that begins with Mifeprex that can be a problem. The second drug, Cytotec, is a
prescription drug that is
dispensed by pharmacists. If Planned Parenthood ever decides to give
prescriptions for Cytotec for women to pick up at the local pharmacy, then that presents problems
for pharmacies who have the safety of their patients in mind as well as conscientious objections to
dispensing abortion drugs. In this case HB 1274 would address a follow up visit and the
prescription drug of Cytotec in conjunction with the administration of RU-486.
Missouri legislators have demonstrated strong support through the years for policies that
protect human life. Women should be protected from the abuses in the abortion industry by those
who would profit from abortion. Missouri Right to Life therefore strongly supports HB 1274 and
Tuesday 8th August 2006 10:00 Council meeting (Boardroom 5.68 in the Wills Memorial Building) 14:00 Registration (Wills Memorial Building) 14:00 Installation of Group 1 Posters (Merchant Venturers Building) 19:00-21.30 Welcome Reception (In the Museum adjacent to the Wills Memorial Building) Wednesday 9th August 2006 08:00 Registration (Wills Memorial Building) 08:00 Installati
Sziasztok! Immár a MizUJS máso- Január dik számát tartjátok kezetekben, WUJS congress amely egyben hanukai kiadásunk Az újév idén is Izraelben talált, nemzetközi anyaszervezetünk éves kongresszusát. A is. Ez alkalommal köszöntök min- non stop bulit ezúttal politikai játszmák tarkították. den UJS tagot és szimpatizánst. A Február MizUJS egy kísérlet