Zealand clinical practice guideline for the management of anorexia nervosa (2003)
Pierre Beumont, Phillipa Hay and Rochelle Beumont for the RANZCP Multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Guideline Team for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa Objective: To provide a summary of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Conclusions: Anorexia nervosa affects only a small proportion of the Australian and New Zealand population but it is important because it is a serious and potentially life-threatening illness. Sufferers often struggle with AN for many years, if not for life, and the damage done to their minds and bodies may be irreversible. Anorexia nervosa is characterized by a deliberate loss of weight and refusal to eat. Overactivity is common. Approximately 50% of patients also use unhealthy purging and vomiting behaviours to lose weight. There are two main areas of physical interest: the undernutrition and mal- nutrition of the illness and the various detrimental weight-losing behaviours themselves. Basic psychopathology ranges from an over-valued idea of high salience concerning body shape through to total preoccupation and eventually to firmly held ideas that resemble delusions. Comorbid features are frequent, especially depression and obsessionality. It is inadvisable in clinical practice to apply too strict a definition of AN because to do so excludes patients in the early stage of the illness in whom prompt intervention is most likely to be effective. The best treatment appears to be multidimensional/multidisciplinary care, using a range of settings as required. Obviously, the medical manifestations of the illness need to be addressed and any physical harm halted and reversed. It is difficult to draw conclusions about the efficacy of further treatments. There is a paucity of clinical trials, and their quality is poor. Furthermore, the stimuli for developing AN are varied, and the psychotherapy options to address these problems need to be tailored to suit the individual patient. Because there is no known ‘chemical imbalance’ that causes the illness, no one drug offers relief. There is a high rate of relapse, and some patients are unable to recover fully. Because AN is a psychiatric illness, a psychiatrist should always be involved in its treatment. All psychiatrists should be capable of assuming this responsibility. Australasian Psychiatry Because cognitive behavioural methods are generally accepted as the best modeof therapy, a clinical psychologist should also be involved in treatment. Becausemedical manifestations are important, someone competent in general medicinePierre Beumont should always be consulted. The optimal approach is multidisciplinary or at
Professor of Psychiatry, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and the
least multiskilled, with important contributions from psychologists, general
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. practitioners, psychiatric nurses, paediatricians, dietitians and social workers.Phillipa Hay
Department of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide,
Key words: chronicity, depression, malnutrition, obsessionality, purging. Rochelle Beumont Consultant Project Researcher, Wesley Private Hospital, Sydney, INTRODUCTION
roposing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for anorexia nervosa
June 2003 Correspondence: Professor Pierre Beumont, Department of
(AN) poses several particular problems in addition to those
Psychological Medicine, D06 University of Sydney, NSW 2006,
encountered with other clinical guidelines: definitions; the multi-
disciplinary approach required for optimal treatment; the persistence of
illness from childhood and adolescence well into
other health professionals to provide optimal care.
adult life; the severity of the illness; and the paucity
The principal therapist may well be a clinical psychol-
of controlled randomized studies from which to make
ogist, paediatrician, general practitioner or dietician.
recommendations. Notwithstanding the inevitable
Further, too often AN is considered to be only an
limitations of CPGs, this document provides an
adolescent disorder. In fact it often starts prior to
overview of the available evidence to guide clinical
puberty and persists through adolescence into adult
life (average duration approx. 5 years). There areinvariably problems of transition as the patient devel-
Definitions
ops (or fails to develop) from adolescence to maturity.
Anorexia nervosa is an eating, or perhaps better,
Anorexia nervosa frequently becomes chronic or
dieting disorder, and needs to be distinguished from
disordered eating, such as that contributing to obes-ity or part of unusual syndromes such as pica or
CURRENT TREATMENT EVIDENCE
ruminative disorder. Anorexia nervosa, bulimia ner-
The purpose of this section is not to promote
vosa (BN) and atypical eating disorders not otherwise
unconditionally the concept of ‘best’ treatment, or to
specified (EDNOS) are psychiatric illnesses recognized
preclude treatments for which there are no rand-
as part of a special category in Diagnostic and Statis-
omized controlled trials (RCTs). ‘Insufficient evi-
tical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn; DSM-IV)
dence’ for treatments is not the same as ‘no evidence’
and International Statistical Classification of Diseases
or ‘evidence of ineffectiveness’, and established clini-
and Health-related Problems (10th edn; ICD-10). Our
cal consensus opinions are valid in the absence of
commission from the College was to deal with AN,
other levels of evidence. Unless otherwise specified,
and specifically exclude BN, presumably because
studies cited here are at least from level [II] evidence,
there are excellent reviews of the latter disorder,
applying the National Health and Medical Research
particularly that of Fairburn and Wilson (in the book
A Guide To Treatments That Work). But EDNOS israther different. Many EDNOS patients have binge
Inpatient versus outpatient or day-patient
eating disorder (as yet poorly understood) or disor-
treatment of the underweight patient
ders that are secondary to other psychiatric illnesses
For those patients in whom the illness is severe
(e.g. depression), or have unusual and perhaps bizarre
enough to consider inpatient care but not severe
conditions, which are unique, hence are not relevant
enough for this to be essential, comprehensive out-
to this document. However, a large number of EDNOS
patient or day-patient treatment has been found to
patients are those in the process of developing AN, or
be at least as effective, if not more so. Outpatient
those in whom the illness is in partial remission.
treatment is considerably cheaper, less intrusive, and
Obviously both these groups need to be included.
has greater adherence, hence is to be preferred. The
Overview of the clinical epidemiology
benefits of both forms of treatment appear to increaseover time. Inpatient care is mandatory at times of
Eating disorders are a group of common illnesses
acute medical crisis, rapid weight loss or physical
that impose a considerable burden on health care.
Although AN is a low-prevalence disorder (lifetimerisk 0.2–0.5% of women, approx. half that of schizo-
Family therapy versus individual therapy or no
phrenia), it is a very serious condition, with a mortal-
specific therapy
ity rate higher than any other psychiatric illness and
In the stage of weight restoration
a suicide rate higher than that of major depression. Its seriousness is often not appreciated.
Family therapy was found to be no more effectivethan individual therapy: In 37 adolescents (11–
GENERAL MANAGEMENT ISSUES
20 years) with DSM-III-R-defined anorexia nervosa,who all received common medical treatment and
There is general consensus that a multiskilled and
dietary advice, behavioural family systems therapy
June 2003
multidisciplinary approach is optimal utilizing cogni-
was found to be associated with greater weight gain
tive, behavioural, and motivational enhancement
and more frequent resumption of menses than ego-
therapies (psychologists), nutritional supervision
orientated individual therapy. However, there was no
and counselling (dietitians), family and individual
difference in attenuation of eating disorder attitudes,
therapy (psychotherapists), skilled nursing care, and
adequately trained family doctors (and in some cir-cumstances, paediatricians and physicians). However,
Two studies compared outpatient individual and
despite the multidimensional facets of AN’s presenta-
family psychotherapy to outpatient group psycho-
tion that often leads to it being an ‘orphan’ condition
therapy, inpatient treatment (one study), and
with no discipline taking responsibility, AN is pri-
assessment only or ‘routine care’ for new adult refer-
marily a psychiatric illness, and every psychiatrist
rals to a specialist unit. There was significantly better
should be capable of treating AN and of involving
weight maintenance and psychological and social
Australasian Psychiatry
adjustment at 2 years in the psychotherapy groups.
(300 mg day–1) found no significant differences
Poor prognosis was associated with prior low weight,
between groups although weight gain appeared better
treatment non-compliance and self-induced vomit-
in the fluoxetine group. This finding is supported by
ing. Those in the assessment-only group had the least
Clomipramine Family therapy versus individual supportive therapy in
A 16-patient study on the effect of 50 mg daily of
the prevention of relapse
clomipramine to a placebo over 8 weeks found there
Family therapy is directed to global family function-
was little effect on ultimate outcome. Clomipramine
ing while counselling is restricted to empowering
leads to increased hunger, appetite and energy intake
family members to assume responsibility for the
and there was a suggestion of better weight main-
patient’s behaviour. Family therapy appears favour-
tenance at follow up. Caveats include the small
able for adolescent patients with early onset and
numbers and relatively low dose of clomipramine.
short history of AN, while those patients with late-
Growth hormone
onset anorexia appear to do better with individualsupportive therapy.
Growth hormone (0.05 mg kg–2day) therapy to hastenmedical stabilization in patients undergoing re-
Family therapy versus family counselling
feeding has been evaluated. The growth hormone
Outcomes of a pilot trial in this topic suggest that
group had shorter hospital stay (not significant) and
both therapies are equally effective. There was a trend
reached a stable state with respect to cardiovascular
towards better improvement in the separated family
function (absence of orthostasis by pulse) in a shorter
therapy group (76% good/intermediate global out-
time (p < 0.02). There was no difference in rates of
come ratings) compared to the conjoint therapy
group (47% good/intermediate outcome). Cyproheptadine Pharmacotherapy
A number of studies have looked at the effect of daily
Cisapride
doses of cyproheptadine on weight gain. The conclu-sions from these trials suggest that the medication
One inpatient study found that there were no vari-
may have an effect for non-bulimic patients, in terms
ances in weight gain for patients prescribed cisapride
of weight gain and in some psychological measures
versus placebo but other differences were found,
(e.g. attenuating the thin ideal). However, there were
namely subjects with cisapride were hungrier and
reported problems of hypersomnia, and stomatitis
showed more subjective improvement. However,
and hypersomnia led to the withdrawal of patients
findings from a study conducted on outpatients were
suggestive of improved weight gain and acceleratedgastric emptying in treated versus placebo group. Zinc supplementation
Of note, though, are the problems with cardiac side-
The use of zinc supplementation (100 mg daily of
effects (serious cardiac arrythmias) of cisapride,
zinc gluconate) to increase rate of weight gain has
which have led to its limitation in Australia to use for
gastroparesis under a consultant physician’s author-ity only. Hence it is no longer used for AN. Clonidine
A 1987 trial found no effect for clonidine in a RCT of
Antidepressants
four treatment-resistant inpatients. Low participation
In one published study of fluoxetine (up to 60 mg
day–1, mean: 56.0 mg) as augmentation therapy therewas no evidence of a beneficial effect on the outcome
Anti-psychotics Australasian Psychiatry
measure of weight gain, symptom severity scores,
Pimozide has been found to enhance weight gain in
depression or general psychiatric symptoms. In a
a study of 18 inpatients on a behavioural programme.
placebo-controlled RCT of 5 weeks of amitriptyline
Conclusions cannot be drawn on the use of sulpiride
(mean dose: 115 mg day–1) all patients did poorly. A
because of the possibility of a type II error in the trial
1995 study on the use of either nortriptyline (n = 7,
concerning this drug. There have been several enthu-
75 mg day–1) or fluoxetine (n = 15, 60 mg day–1) in
siastic anecdotal reports of the efficacy of olanzapine
addition to psychological therapies (nutritional coun-
in respect to weight gain and reversing anorexic
selling and cognitive–behavioural therapy), found
that weight gain and anxiety reduction were greaterin the nortryptyline group and that there were
Lithium
no between-group differences in eating disorder or
A 4-week crossover placebo controlled trial in 16
June 2003
depressive symptom severity. Small numbers limit
inpatients (aged 12–32, mean: 19.8 years) on a
conclusions. A further study by the same authors
specialist behaviour programme reported minimal
investigating fluoxetine (60 mg day–1) or amineptine
adverse effects, and greater weight gain in weeks
3 and 4 in the lithium group. The mean plasma
Comparisons of different individual and other psychotherapies
Dietary advice sessions may increase weight gain,
Cannabis
while combined individual and family psychotherapy
α9THC α-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (7.5–30 mg day–1)
may assist patients with sexual and social adjustment.
compared to diazepam (3–15 mg day–1) in patients all
For adult patients with AN, both cognitive analytical
on a behavioural group programme with nutritional
therapy and educational behavioural treatment may
counselling was not effective and there was more
bring about good or intermediate recovery in terms of
nutritional outcome, but the former is seen as slightlypreferable because patients reported significantly
Naltrexone
greater subjective improvement. For adolescents,there is a slight trend in favour of family systems
A 6-week trial of naltrexone (100–200 mg b.d.) in a
therapy over ego-orientated individual therapy in
mixed group of BN and bingeing AN outpatients,
terms of weight gain and maternal communication.
found significant reductions in binge–purging in thetreatment group. Subjects were blinded, but they
Treatments for osteoporosis in anorexia nervosa
In a non-blinded trial of oestrogen (with progestin)versus no replacement only those with low body
Discharge at normal weight versus discharge at
weight (<70%) appeared to benefit from oestrogen. below normal weight
In a trial of oral dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) a
Patients discharged while severely underweight have
50-mg dose restored physiologic hormonal levels.
higher rates of re-hospitalization and are more symp-
Markers showed a decrease in bone reabsorption and
tomatic than those who achieve normal weight at
an increase in bone formation. There were no signifi-
cant changes in bone mineral density at any site, norany adverse effects reported. Bed-rest versus supervised exercise, lenient versus Psychological treatments that may be beneficial strict weight restoration programmes but which have no empirical backing
No clear conclusions were drawn from comparison of
Motivational therapy
a specialist graded exercise programme following
The goal of motivational interviewing is to facilitate
inpatient care with standard treatment (although
the patients’ readiness to change. Although using
type II error was a possibility). A second study [III-2]
strategies to enhance motivation to change is intui-
comparing lenient and strict operant conditioning
tively compelling in the psychological treatment of
programmes found no difference in weight gain, but
AN, it should be noted that there is no published
several practical advantages of the more lenient pro-
empirical evidence supporting their use.
gramme. A third study showed that brief (i.e. a fewdays) reward programmes were beneficial in promot-
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Specialist versus non-specialist programmes
Given the quality of evidence available (most notablythe small size and short duration of most trials) on the
A 1992 study [III] comparing mortality rates in
treatments for AN, dogmatism is best avoided. Obvi-
two cohorts of AN patients, followed for a mean of
ously more research needs to be undertaken. Based on
20 years, from a specialist and a non-specialist centre
the current findings there is evidence to suggest that
found that standardized and crude mortality rates
some treatment of a general nature for AN results in
were higher in those treated in a non-specialist unit.
lower mortality than no treatment at all, and is there-fore to be recommended. Family-based approaches
June 2003 Cognitive–behaviour psychotherapy and behaviour
have moderate support as effective treatments for AN,
therapy in treatment of anorexia nervosa
especially in younger patients who have a short his-tory of the disorder. Individual CBT also has moderate
While there appears to be little difference in health
support as an effective treatment, as do combined
status in patients exposed to cognitive–behaviour
treatments, especially an integration of psycho-
therapy (CBT) versus behaviour treatment, patients
dynamic and cognitive behavioural treatments, but
were more likely to complete treatment or be retained
also family and psychodynamic treatments.
in therapy with CBT. Compared with patients receiv-ing dietary advice, CBT subjects showed improve-
There is widespread agreement in the current clinical
ments in eating disorder and depressive symptom
and research literature that multidimensional, multi-
severity, and body mass index. All those receiving
disciplinary treatment approaches are preferential
dietary advice only ‘dropped out’ of treatment.
for effective treatment. Treatment usually needs to be
Australasian Psychiatry
multidimensional in the sense that: (i) comprehen-
the various teams for the mental health practitioner version of the guidelines, as well
sive assessments are done (i.e. physical, psycho-
as the consumer and carer consultants, are acknowledged with their affiliations in thecomprehensive version in the College journal.
logical, psychosocial, developmental and familyhistories); (ii) multiple treatment modalities are con-
sidered (i.e. medication, nutrition, and individual,group and family psychotherapies); and (iii) multiple
Details of the studies cited and their references are given in the full version of theClinical Practice Guidelines, to be published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal
interventions are all considered (i.e. behavioural,
of Psychiatry and on the College website http://www.ranzcp.org.au. Further recom-
cognitive–behavioural, psychodynamic, and inter-
American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Eating
Disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 2000; 150: 207–228.
Treatment may also be multidisciplinary in the sensethat the services of psychiatrists, primary care physi-
Beumont PJV, Russell JD, Touyz SW. Treatment of anorexia nervosa. Lancet 1993; 341:
cians, psychologists, registered dietitians, nurses, and
social workers may all be utilized in a comprehensive,
Garner DM, Garfinkel PE. Handbook of Treatment for Eating Disorders, 2nd edn. New
coordinated manner. Obviously such treatment
approaches need to be administered in a holistic,
Mitchell E. Eating disorders. In: Pomeroy C, Mitchell JE, Roerig J, Crow S, eds. MedicalComplications of Psychiatric Illness. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Associa-tion, 2001.
Touyz SW, Garner DM, Beumont PJV. The inpatient management of the adolescent
patient with anorexia nervosa. In: Steinhausen HC, ed. Eating Disorders in Adol-
This CPG was funded by the National Mental Health Strategy, Commonwealth
escence: Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa. New York: Walter de Gruyter/Aldine
Department of Health and Ageing. The authors are solely responsible for the document
but they used material provided by a number of different writing teams, that wasprepared after wide consultation throughout Australia and New Zealand, and with the
Wilson GT, Fairburn CG. Treatment for eating disorders. In: Nathan PE, Gorman JM, eds.
input of several overseas authorities. The convenors of the consortium, members of
A Guide to Treatments That Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Australasian Psychiatry June 2003
Emergency Evacuation of Building Procedure Standard− Under Critical Incident Policy & Procedure (Staff, Trainers, Students) The purpose of this procedure is to recognise the Emergency Procedure in case of fire,earthquake or terrorist attack and bomb threat or any type of emergency situation where theInstitute needs to evacuate the building for the safety of students, staff
CONSULTATION WITH TARGET PATIENT GROUPS - MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 59(3) WITHOUT THE NEED FOR A FULL TEST - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BRIDGING Revision 1, April 2009 1. INTRODUCTION Guidance has already been issued from the CMD(h) which indicates that although all package leaflets (PLs) for medicines must reflect the results of consultation with target patient