Prevalence of crab asthma in crab plant workers in Newfoundland and Labrador
André Cartier 1, Samuel B. Lehrer 2, Lise Horth-Susin 3,Mark Swanson 4, Barbara Neis 5, Dana Howse 5, Michael Jong 5
1 Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal2 Tulane University, New Orleans3 Valley Regional Hospital, Kentville4 Mayo Clinic5 Memorial University
ABSTRACT Objectives. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of snow crab sensitisation and occu- pational asthma. Study design. Prevalence study of symptoms, pulmonary function testing and allergy testing to crab was conducted in four crab plants of different design in Newfoundland and Labrador, Ca- nada. Methods. Plants workers in four crab plants were interviewed and offered skin testing, RAST, pul- monary function testing and peak flow monitoring before and during crab processing. Results. 38% (n=78) had atopy. 18% (n=39) had certain or highly probable crab asthma. The prevalence of sensiti- sation in different crab plants varied from 50% (n=19) to 15% (n=16) and the prevalence of certain or highly probable crab asthma varied from 50% (n=19) to 9% (n=3). Conclusion. Crab asthma and sen- sitisation to snow crab is a major health problem for snow crab plant workers in Newfoundland and Lab- rador. INTRODUCTION
veloping snow crab occupational asthma while
This research is conducted in Newfoundland and
atopy is associated with an increased risk of sen-
Labrador, which is on the eastern seaboard of Ca-
sitisation to crab allergens. This research has also
nada. In this province, ground fish catch has
shown that occupational asthma is primarily
dropped 90% from 400,000 metric tonnes in 1988
caused by a process of sensitisation to an allergen
to 30,000 metric tonnes in 1993. Snow crab is the
in the snow crab that becomes airborne during
most commonly processed and the highest reve-
processing: snow crab processing is highly aller-
nue-producing species, accounting for $1.6 billion
genic, as crab allergens are aerosolised in the air
during cooking of crab (transported by steam and
One of the earliest researches on snow crab oc-
water droplets and vapours), butchering of crab
cupational asthma that described the condition
was conducted in Newfoundland in 1978 (1).
Snow crab asthma is mediated through an al-
Since that time, the research related to this prob-
lergic mechanism involving the production of
lem in the province has been limited and there has
specific IgE antibodies to crab meat and cooking
been no prevalence study on occupational snow
Many workers with crab occupational asthma
Research in Quebec in 1984 indicated that the
can continue to work using asthma medications.
prevalence of snow crab occupational asthma
However, the asthma of some workers will wors-
was 15% in plants that have been open for only a
few years (1). Smoking increases the risk of de-
symptoms in crab plant workers is higher than the
ical history of symptoms of asthma during the
level of sensitisation. It has been hypothesised
season improving after leaving work and posi-
that exposure to chemical irritants may explain
tive skin test or RAST indicating sensitization to
these non-specific symptoms. Various amines, re-
snow crab but no peak flow monitoring data.
sponsible for the odour often found in crab plants,
Those with a possible diagnosis would have had
are released during the cooking of crab (8). These
a positive medical history, negative RAST or
amines can be toxic at high levels, but their pres-
skin test and no peak flow monitoring data, and
ence in crab plants probably does not explain
those with a diagnosis of unlikely or negative oc-
these symptoms, as levels measured in the plants
cupational asthma would have had no history of
asthma symptoms at work improving after leav-ing work, could have had a negative or positive
skin test or RAST and no or negative peak flow
In consultation with the Working Group on Shell-
fish, comprising plant managers, union represen-
Occupational allergy was categorised as high-
tatives, Workplace Health and Safety Compensa-
ly probable if there were symptoms of rhino-
tion Commission (WHSCC) and provincial go-
conjunctivitis during the working season and im-
vernment officials, four plants with different ages
proving after the season, and positive skin test to
of the plants, types of processing and ventilation
snow crab meat or RAST to snow crab meat or
cooking water, regardless of symptoms of occu-
In the winter of 2002, current and former
pational asthma. It was categorised as possible if
workers who volunteered for the study were
there were symptoms of rhino-conjunctivitis
given questions on their work history, symptoms
during the working season and improving after
of asthma, rhino-conjunctivitis and rash, cur-
the season, symptoms of occupational crab asth-
rently, in the past and in the last season. Spirom-
ma but negative skin test and RAST to snow
etry was conducted and if there was an obstruc-
crab. It was classified as unlikely if there were
tive pattern this was repeated after ventolin in-
symptoms of rhino-conjunctivitis during the
halation. Skin tests to common allergens and to
working season and improving after the season,
snow crab meat were administered to those who
but no symptoms for occupational crab asthma
agreed. Blood was taken for radio-allergo-sor-
and if skin test and RAST were negative. It was
bant test (RAST) to snow crab cooking water
negative for occupational allergy if there were
and meat. Current workers were instructed how
no symptoms of rhino-conjunctivitis, occupa-
to perform and record peak flows and were in-
tional crab asthma, negative skin test and nega-
structed to do peak flows every 2 hours every
day 2 weeks before working in the crab plantand two weeks during work. Support was given
The overall participation rate was 43% (n=215).
The range in participation at different plants
into almost certain, highly probable, possible
ranged from 38% to 44%. The size of the current
and unlikely or negative. Those with a diagnosis
work force ranged from 33 to 87 workers. (See
of almost certain occupational asthma had symp-
toms of asthma during the season, improving af-ter leaving work in their medical history, a posi-
The participants’ ages ranged from 17 to 62
tive skin test or RAST indicating allergy to
years, with the mean age of 40 years. Fifty-six
snow crab and positive peak flow monitoring.
percent of the workers were current smokers,
Those with a diagnosis of highly probable occu-
20% ex-smokers and 24% had never smoked.
pational asthma would have had a positive med-
Sixty-nine percent were Caucasian, 17% Inuit
Table I. Number of participants by plants. All identified former and current workers in 2001 reached.
and 14% Meti. Fifty-six percent of the partici-
oldest crab plant with poor ventilation that pro-
cessed cooked crab. The 2nd lowest prevalence
Overall, 18% (n=39) of the participants had
rate of occupational crab asthma of 10% was in
an "almost certain" or "highly probable" diagno-
the 2nd oldest but largest plant that has good ven-
sis of snow crab occupational asthma and 22%
tilation and that cleaned and butchered crabs raw
(n=45) a diagnosis of possible snow crab occu-
with cooking as the final process before brine
pational asthma. In plant 1, ten people (10%)
freezing. The lowest prevalence rate of occupa-
were given an "almost certain" or "highly prob-
tional asthma of 9% was in the newest plant of 2
able" diagnosis. Twenty-seven people (26%)
years that cleaned clusters of raw crabs, cooked
were given a "possible" diagnosis. In plant 2,
and brine froze the crabs without butchering.
nineteen (50%) of participants were given either
The prevalence rates of snow crab allergy are si-
an "almost certain" or "highly probable" diagno-
milar to snow crab asthma. It appears that pro-
sis. Five workers (13%) were given a "possible"
cessing raw crabs may be associated with a lo-
diagnosis of occupational asthma to snow crab.
wer rate of occupational snow crab allergy and
In plant 3, seven people (17%) were given either
asthma. This will need to be confirmed by furt-
an "almost certain" or "highly probable" diagno-
her studies to control for other variables inclu-
sis of occupational asthma to snow crab. Nine
ding the duration of exposure, the efficiency of
people (22%) were given a "possible" diagnosis.
In plant 4, three people (9%) were given eitheran "almost certain" or "highly probable" diagno-
Acknowledgement
sis of occupational asthma to snow crab. Six
Funding was provided by the Canadian Institute
people (18%) were given a "possible" diagnosis.
The prevalence of occupational allergy was
highly likely in 18% (n=39) and possible in
REFERENCES
16% (n=35) of workers who participated. The
Cartier A, Malo JL, Forest F, Lafrance M, Pineau L,
range of highly probable allergy in different
St-Aubin JJ et al. Occupational asthma in snow crab-processing workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol
crab plants varied from 45% (n=17) to 9% (n=3).
Malo JL, Chrétien P, McCants M, Lehrer S. Detection
DISCUSSION
of snow-crab antigens by air sampling of a snow-crab
Snow crab occupational asthma appears to be a
crab production plant. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27
major problem in the province of Newfoundland
Weytjens K, Cartier A, Malo JL, Chretien P, Essiembre
and Labrador, with a prevalence rate of about
F, Lehrer S et al.Aerosolized snow-crab allergens in a
18% in the 4 crab plants studied. The rates for
processing facility.Allergy 1999;54(8):892-3.
occupational crab asthma range from 50% in the
Cartier A, Malo JL, Ghezzo H, McCants M, Lehrer SB. IgE sensitization in snow crab-processing workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986;78:344-8.
Chan-Yeung M, Maclean L, Paggiaro PL. Follow-up study of 232 patients with occupational asthma caused by western red cedar (Thuja plicata). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987;79:792-6.
Côté J, Kennedy S, Chan-Yeung M. Outcome of patients with cedar asthma with continuous exposure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:373-6.
Moscato G, Dellabianca A, Perfetti L, Brame B, Galdi E, Niniano R et al. Occupational asthma: a longitudinal study on the clinical and socioeconomic outcome after diagnosis. Chest 1999;115(1):249-56.
Guillot JG. Vapeurs de crabe. Interface Mars-April,27-32. 1984. Ref Type:Abstract
Dr. Michael Jong, Associate ProfessorMemorial UniversityP.O. Box 205, Stn. BHappy Valley-Goose Bay,Newfoundland and LabradorCanada A0P 1E0
SCHEDULE 1 PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES Where a Prohibited Substance (as listed below) is capable of being produced by the body naturally, a sample will be deemed to be positive where the concentration of the Prohibited Substance or its metabolites or markers and/or any other relevant ratio(s) in the athlete’s body tissues or fluids so exceeds, or deviates from, the range of values normally
LINGÜÍSTICA NOSSA QUE SE PRETENDE SER DE CADA DIAJornal Imagem (Nova Andradina-MS), 07/03/2009, p. 02Pelos erros nossos de cada dia: Pai, Perdoa-nos, pois não sabemos como dizer. Semana passada refletia neste espaço a respeito do preconceito que não é lingüístico, mas que acima de tudo, é social. Volto a tocar no assunto mais uma vez, como forma de dar continuidade a um debate que re