orkers’ Compensation Costs
This section reviews recent trends in the cost of workers’compensation insurance in New Mexico including:
Premium Rate in Voluntary Market Rises Again While Assigned Risk Rate Falls
The average cost of workers’ compensation insurance in New
Mexico’s voluntary market rose slightly for the second straight
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
year. In January 2002, New Mexico’s Superintendent of
Figure 7. Net Premium Rate Change, New Mexico Voluntary
Insurance approved a premium rate increase of 1 percent after
and Assigned Risk Markets, 1990-2002.
approving a 3 percent increase the previous January. The 1percent increase is an average across all sectors of industry. Premium rates for Manufacturing, Contracting, Office and
Employers with a history of higher than average losses began
Clerical, and miscellaneous sectors increased (8.9 percent, 3.4
paying significantly higher premiums in 2002, even while overall
percent, 0.9 percent, and 11.1 percent, respectively) while the
rates decreased in the assigned risk market and increased only
rate for the Goods and Services sector decreased (-8 percent;
slightly in the voluntary market. This increase occurred when
Retterath, Karpuk, Nielsen, & Kokulac, 2002). Average increases
NCCI increased policyholders’ experience modifiers to raise
over the last two years are small, considering the dramatic drop
New Mexico’s average, which was below the target value of 1.0
in New Mexico’s workers’ compensation premiums since 1992.
(Discussion at NCCI State Forum in Albuquerque, NM, June
Rate adjustments reduced premiums in the voluntary market by
2002). Basically, experience rating is a method for adjusting the
87.6 percent between 1992 and 2000, 1as Figure 7 shows (NCCI,
premium rate according to the employer’s history of workers’
2002a). New Mexico’s voluntary market consists of insurance
compensation losses in the preceding three years. That history is
carriers who may choose to insure a particular employer,
expressed as a ratio called the experience modifier, which
divides the employer’s actual losses by average losses expected
Premium rates in the assigned risk market dropped by 11.7
from the population of employees in the same industry and
percent in January 2002, adding to decreases since 1994 when
occupation. The average rating in New Mexico was 0.93 or less
the New Mexico Department of Insurance began approving a
throughout the period 1996 to 2000. NCCI described the
series of downward adjustments. These changes reduced
difference between New Mexico’s average and the target value
premium rates in the assigned risk market by 58.5percent
as a slight credit to policyholders.
between 1993 and 2002, 2as Figure 7 shows (NCCI, 2002a). NewMexico’s Assigned Risk Pool provides coverage for employerswho cannot purchase insurance from the voluntary market
Earned Premiums Go Up After Long Decline
because their experience with claim losses is extensive, they arein a business that underwriters consider hazardous, or because
Direct earned premiums in New Mexico’s voluntary and
they are new employers who lack a loss history. Premium rates in
assigned risk markets increased in 2001 for the first time since
the assigned risk market are higher than those in the voluntary
1992, rising 7.7 percent to $119.4 million from a record low of
$110.9 million in 2000 (National Association of Insurance
The rapid decline in New Mexico’s premium rates during the
Commissioners [NAIC], 2002). Direct earned premiums peaked
1990s is remarkable compared to rates countrywide. In 1994,
at $232.9 million in 1992 (NAIC, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992a,
New Mexico’s premium rate index was seventh highest in the
1993a, 1994a, 1995a, 1996a, 1997a, 1998a, 1999a, 2000a,
country at $5.75 per $100 of payroll (Oregon Department of
Consumer and Business Services [ODCBS], 1994). It steadilydecreased to 42nd in the country, going to $1.66 per $100 ofpayroll by the year 2000, the most recent statistics available(ODCBS, 2001).
NM Workers’ Compensation Administration
effectively self-insuring up to the threshold amount. The
Direct Earned Premiums Paid Losses
employer assumes less financial risk under smaller deductibles
and, accordingly, pays more on premiums. Incurred Losses Exceed Premium Earnings
Direct incurred losses in New Mexico turned sharply higher in
2001, rising 274 percent from $32.5 million to $121.7 million
(NAIC, 2002, 2001). An incurred loss is the estimated value of
benefits paid over the lifetime of a claim. It includes losses
already paid and reserves set aside to pay for future losses.
Apparently the largest share of that rise is from increased reserv-
ing because losses paid by insurance carriers in New Mexico only
increased by 16.6 percent in 2001 (based on information reported
to the WCA on the Annual Expenditure Report for InsuranceCarriers and Self-Insured Employers). The increase in incurred losses pushed New Mexico’s loss
ratio higher. Direct incurred losses in 2001 exceeded directearned premiums by 1.8 percent (NAIC, 2002). In other words,
for every $100 of premium collected, $101.80 was incurred inlosses. Reports of loss ratios of 100 or more have become more
common among the state’s carriers. In 1998 all carriers earning
premiums in New Mexico reported loss ratios below 100 (NAIC,1999a). The share reporting a ratio of 100 or more steadily grew
to 36.9 percent by 2001 (NAIC, 2000a, 2001a, 2002). Statistics comparing New Mexico’s underwriting profitability
in 2001 with other states are not yet available. In 2000, the state’sadjusted loss ratio was the fourth lowest in the country, accordingto A.M. Best. Direct losses incurred and dividends paid to
policyholders were 34.9 percent of earned premiums
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
(Rousmaniere & Chadwick, 2001). New Mexico’s adjusted loss
Data Sources: Direct Earned Premiums - New Mexico Workers’ Compensation InsuranceMarket Share Reports, 1989-2001; National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
ratio was substantially lower than the country’s between 1994 and
Paid Losses - WCA Annual Expenditure Report, 1993-2001.
2000, and the gap increased after 1997, as Figure 9 shows
(Farinella, 1995; Ryan & Ostermiller, 1996; Sweeney, 1997;Ostermiller, 1998; Bowers, 1999; Goch, 2000; Rousmaniere &
Figure 8. Insurance Carriers’ Direct Earned Premiums and Paid
Chadwick). New Mexico’s loss ratio leveled off at close to 36
Losses in New Mexico, 1989-2001.
percent between 1997 and 2000 while the country’s loss ratiosteadily worsened, going from. 62.7 percent to 84.2 percent.
Part of this increase comes from a reduction in premiumdiscounts that include dividends paid to policyholders; the loss
costs departure, which is a modifier to account for changes in
claim payments and loss adjustment expenses; and schedule
rating, which debits or credits employers for certain risk factors
(e.g. an employer might be credited for having safety and returnto work programs). During policy years 1996 through 1999,
discounts in New Mexico’s voluntary market averaged 13.4
percent (Retterath, et al., 2002). The average discount declined
to 5 percent in policy year 2000 when a 5 percent increase in losscosts — the first increase since 1995 — counteracted premium
reductions from dividends paid to policyholders and credits from
Earned premium may also be rising because of a recentdecline in deductibles paid by New Mexico employers. New
Mexico employers paid an estimated $11.7 million in deductibles
in 1996, decreasing to $3.1 million in 2000 (National Academyof Social Insurance, in press). Under deductible policies,
Data Source: Best’s Review, 1993-2000, A.M. Best Co., Inc.
insurance carriers pay for all benefits on a claim and employers
Figure 9. New Mexico and U.S. Adjusted Loss Ratios,
reimburse the cost up to a certain threshold. The employer is
1993-2000.
The state had the fifth largest margin of underwriting profit in
was revised upward by 21 percentage points at the end of 2001
the country in 2000, earning $35.50 for every $100 of premiums
(Liu, 2002; see table in endnote).5 That gap, commonly known as
collected (NAIC, 2001b). This value represents income on
a reserve deficiency, has steadily grown since accident year 1995
insurance transactions after incurring losses and paying under-
when the difference between initial and revised estimates was
writing and administrative expenses, and dividends. Only 9 other
states reported an underwriting profit in 2000. Insurance carrierscountrywide had underwriting losses every year since 1995, and
Reinsurance Market Hardens
losses grew to 25.9 percent of earned premiums in 2000, asFigure 10 shows. New Mexico, on the other hand, had underwrit-
The nation’s reinsurance market shifted dramatically after
ing gains that stayed above 30 percent most of the time through
carrying the major share of workers’ compensation losses from
the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Those losses led to
Carriers serving New Mexico’s workers’ compensation market
sharp increases in reinsurance premium and limited coverage for
enjoyed superior profitability because underwriting expenses
primary carriers and self-insurers buying excess insurance. An
were remarkably low. New Mexico’s combined ratio, which
NCCI survey of Florida reinsurers found that the cost of
includes incurred losses, underwriting and administrative ex-
coverage for losses up to $750,000 in excess of $250,000 has
penses, and dividends, was 64.5 percent of direct earned premi-
increased by an average 28.4 percent. The cost for losses up to
ums in 2000 (NAIC, 2001b). New Mexico’s combined ratio
$25 million in excess of $2.5 million has gone up by 483
improved dramatically in the two years following the 1991
percent, and rates for higher levels of coverage have risen by
Workers’ Compensation Act,4 decreasing from an unprofitable
more than 3,000 percent (Adams, 2002). NCCI said the survey
133.8 percent, as Figure 10 shows. In most years through 2000,
gives a good picture of reinsurance trends nationwide.
the combined ratio was between 65 percent and 72 percent
Reinsurers are restricting coverage overall and, in some cases,
(NAIC, 1992b, 1993b, 1994b, 1995b, 1996b, 1997b, 1998b,
excluding coverage altogether when employers have heavy
concentrations of workers at one location in a major city (Auden& Schneider, 2002). Florida reinsurers are limiting coverage to acertain loss threshold where they formerly provided unlimitedcoverage (Adams, 2002). Twelve states have approved terrorist
exclusions for excess insurance purchased by self-insured
employers, though the decision is controversial and could have
severe financial consequences for self-insurers and guarantee
funds if another attack occurs (Fletcher, 2002; Heidrich, 2002).
New Mexico’s primary carriers and self-insurers are following
the rest of the nation in paying higher premiums or retaining their
Total Claim Costs Increase
The total cost (paid losses) of workers’ compensation claims
rose by 10.9 percent in 2001, increasing to $164.9 million from
$148.7 million in 2000. This is a noticeable change from a
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
succession of substantial decreases extending from 1993 through
Data Source: Profitability Report by State and Line, 1991-2000.
1997 and level costs (or paid losses) from 1997 to 1999, as
National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Figure 11 shows. These paid losses reflect all payments made in
Figure 10. New Mexico’s Incurred Losses, Combined Ratio, and
a calendar year on new and old claims. Underwriting Profit, and Countrywide Underwriting
Higher losses from indemnity claims and medical-only claims
Profit, 1991-2000.
contributed to the increase in total losses. Indemnity claims,sometimes called lost work time claims, are from workers whohave lost more than seven days from work. Indemnity claim
Loss Development Estimates Increasing
costs include benefit payments for wage replacement, health
Insurance carriers periodically review the development of
care, attorney representation, vocational rehabilitation, funerals,
losses over the life of claims to adjust the funding they set aside
and ancillary costs, as Table 8 shows. Medical-only claims are
to pay for future losses on those claims. A comparison of initial
from workers who require medical treatment but do not have
and recently revised loss ratios for New Mexico shows that
more than seven days lost from work. Therefore medical-only
carriers have been raising estimates of paid losses and reserves,
claim costs reflect benefit payments for health care, but not wage
particularly in recent years. The loss ratio for accident year 2000
NM Workers’ Compensation Administration
claims. In 2001 alone, carriers’ losses from indemnity claims
went up a substantial 17.7 percent. A large part of the increase isdue to a 53.8 percent gain from 1997-2001 in the average cost of
an indemnity claim. This average rose from $5,484 per claim in1997 to $8,435 per claim in 2001. Another part of the increase
can be attributed to a growing number of open indemnity claims,which went up from 10,929 claims in 1998 to 11,328 claims in
2001, as Table 8 shows. Higher losses from medical and wage replacement benefitsdrove up the cost of those indemnity claims. Average medical
costs increased by 16.7 percent to $3,366 per indemnity claim in2001. Climbing medication costs, hospital fees, and doctors’
fees are behind this increase, as Table 9 shows. Average
medication costs went up by 27.2 percent in 2001, going from$309 per indemnity claim to $393 per indemnity claim. Averagehospital fees also rose quickly by 20.4 percent in 2001, going
Figure 11. New Mexico Workers' Compensation Insurance Paid Losses by Calendar Year, 1993-2001
from $1,129 per claim to $1,359 per claim. Average doctors’ feeswent up 14.1 percent in 2001, climbing from $1,102 per
Carriers' Self-Insured
indemnity claim to $1,257 per indemnity claim. At the national
Paid Losses Paid Losses Paid Losses
level, the Hartford Financial Services Group reported that the useof more drugs by volume, and a shift to more costly drugs
created a 67 percent increase in their total workers’
compensation medication costs within the past two years. In
their studies of workers’ compensation drugs, they found
Oxycontin, Celebrex, and Vioxx have replaced older and less
costly drugs as the most common pain relievers prescribed to
workers’ compensation patients (Hays, 2002).6
Wage replacement benefits increased an average 16.9 percent
per indemnity claim in 2001 to $3,603. The average cost of
medically related travel per claim rose 27.9 percent in 2001,from $861 per claim to $1,101 per claim. The remaining legalcosts associated with these claims also increased in 2001, but
Paid losses from indemnity claims rose by 10.5 percent in
their contribution was relatively small.
2001, increasing from $130.4 million to $144.1 million. This
Carriers’ losses from open medical-only claims have
increase comes from an 11.3 percent rise in the average cost per
increased since 1993, though somewhat erratically. The average
indemnity claim, which rose to $8,169 in 2001.
cost per medical-only claim has risen almost threefold, going
Paid losses from medical-only claims increased by 13.8
from $365 per claim in 1993 to $892 per claim in 2001.
percent in 2001, rising from $18.3 million to $20.8 million. This
Throughout the 1990’s the gain in average costs did not have a
increase is due to a rise in the number of open claims and an
significant impact on losses because the number of medical-only
increase in the average cost of a medical-only claim. The average
claims dropped by 36.9 percent through 2000. Rising costs first
cost of a medical-only claim rose 7 percent to $823 in 2001.
became evident in 2000, when the number of medical-only
Insurance carriers’ higher losses explain most of the rise in
claims appeared to be leveling off. In 2001, the number of
total losses (94.6 percent), though losses for self-insurers also
medical-only claims reported rose 16.2 percent to 13,048 claims,
went up. This marks the second straight year of increasing paid
losses shared by insurance carriers and self-insurers in theworkers compensation market. The following paragraphs identify
Self-Insurers’ Losses Increase Slightly.
the cost drivers behind these increases.
Total losses to self-insurers increased by 1.5 percent to $57.7
Insurance Carriers’ Losses Increase
million in 2001. Higher medical treatment costs associated with
Significantly
medical-only claims created that increase, while self-insurers’losses from indemnity claims fell by 1.5 percent to $48.5 million.
Insurance carriers’ total losses increased by 16.6 percent to
Self-insurers’ losses from medical-only claims increased by
$107.2 million in 2001, and they have been climbing since 1997
21.4 percent to $9.2 million in 2001. Concurrently, the number
from a low of $79.4 million, as Table 8 shows. This increase is
of medical-only claims reported decreased by 2.8 percent to
coming from higher losses in indemnity claims and medical-only
12,213 claims. Consequently, the average cost of a medical-only
Table 8. Insurance Carriers’ (Voluntary & Assigned Risk) Workers’ Compensation Insurance Paid Losses by Calendar Year, 1993-2001. Paid Losses Loss Category & (Claims Count) INDEMNITY Claims A. Wage Replacement Benefits
$42,096,486 $35,615,428 $33,502,435 $31,061,948 $30,997,523
B. Medical Benefits
$37,291,345 $30,704,897 $29,323,733 $28,687,033 $29,343,577
C. Attorney Fees Benefits D. Vocational-Rehabilitation Benefits E. Other Benefits F. Indemnity Claims Subtotal
$94,614,596 $78,028,347 $74,542,343 $69,904,577 $76,622,132
G. (No. of Indemnity Claims) MEDICAL-ONLY Claims H. Medical Benefits I. (No. of Medical-Only Claims) J. Grand Total Paid Losses
$120,610,207 $101,850,064 $85,106,087 $81,845,452 $79,421,560 $85,589,832
K. Grand Total : No. of Claims L. Average Loss per Indemnity Claim = F/G M. Average Loss per Medical-Only Claim = H/I N. Average Loss per All Voluntary & Assigned Risk Claims =J/K Table 9. Medical Costs Associated with Indemnity Claims for New Mexico's Insurance Carriers and Self-Insured Employers, 1997-2001. Self-Insured Medical Costs Associated with Indemnity Claims: 1997 Insurance Carriers' Medical Costs Associated With Indemnity Claims:
NM Workers’ Compensation Administration
claim in the self-insurance sector jumped 25 percent to $750 in
Higher Losses in Perspective
2001. From 1995-2001, the average cost of a self-insurers’medical-only claim has fluctuated from a high of $773 per claim
Though New Mexico’s paid losses rose significantly in 2001,
in 1995 to a low of $600 per claim in 2000. In comparison, the
costs for benefits have been low compared to other states. In
average cost of a medical-only claim in the insurance carrier
1999, New Mexico’s average cost of medical benefits associated
sector has fluctuated even more broadly, from a high of $957 in
with an indemnity claim was $4,107 (see Appendix E., accident
year 1996, three years mature). This figure was lower than
In 2001, losses from self-insurers’ indemnity claims decreased
average medical costs in eight other states ($4,204 - $10,749)
by 1.5 percent to $48.5 million, as Table 10 shows. Decreases in
evaluated by the Workers’ Compensation Research Institute
the number of indemnity claims open and in the amount of travel
(Telles, Liu, Kowalczyk, & Tanabe, 2001).7 New Mexico’s
benefits paid resulted in lower indemnity claims losses. The
average cost for wage replacement benefits was much lower than
number of open indemnity claims from self-insurers decreased
averages for those states. Average costs for wage replacement
by 1.5 percent between 2000 and 2001. Medically related travel
benefits in the other states ranged from $4,906 per claim to
costs decreased by 15.3 percent to $7.2 million, down from $8.5
$11,671 per claim, whereas New Mexico’s average cost was only
million in 2000. Workers in New Mexico’s outlying communities
$3,308 per claim (accident year 1996, three years mature).
are sometimes treated in larger cities where there are more health
Every year a few hundred indemnity claims generate legal
resources, and where insurers have negotiated lower charges for
costs paid to defense or claimant attorneys. In 2000 for example,
care. Self-insurers’ losses from medically related travel have
only 246 indemnity claims out of 5,603 claims originating in
ranged from as low as $5.0 million in 1995 to as high as $9.0
accident year 1999 had legal costs reported to the WCA. New
Mexico’s average cost for legal benefits paid on those 246 claims
The self-insurers’ decreases in indemnity claims number and
was $1,418 (see Appendix E, accident year 1999, one year
travel costs muted the impact of small cost increases for wage
mature). Average costs for legal benefits paid to defense attor-
replacement benefits and medical treatment benefits associated
neys in other states ranged from $579 to $ 1,955 (accident year
with indemnity claims. Self-insurers’ losses from wage
1998, one year mature) (Telles, et al., 2001).8 Continuing
replacement benefits increased by 1.7 percent in 2001 to $19.3
research is needed to evaluate New Mexico’s increasing workers’
million. Losses from medical benefits associated with indemnity
compensation costs in comparison to national cost trends.
claims increased slightly in 2001 (0.3 percent) to $19.8 million. Within medical benefits losses for self-insurers, the average costof hospitalization visits and medications rose in 2001, but theaverage costs of doctor visits and therapy treatments fell, asTable 9 shows. Table 10. Self-Insured Employers, Groups, and Pools Workers’ Compensation Paid Losses by Calendar Year, 1993-2001. Paid Losses Loss Category & (Claims Count) INDEMNITY Claims A. Wage Replacement Benefits
$31,671,019 $28,640,888 $23,996,886 $26,831,615 $21,786,849 $15,736,760 $18,615,314 $18,947,085 $19,273,570
B. Medical Benefits
$23,055,158 $21,215,133 $22,610,059 $24,058,140 $20,971,882 $20,052,423 $17,831,962 $19,782,724 $19,838,150
C. Attorney Fees Benefits D. Vocational-Rehabilitation Benefits E. Other Benefits F. Indemnity Claims Subtotal
$66,163,105 $59,655,944 $54,608,554 $60,786,850 $51,569,535 $47,228,020 $45,036,955 $49,251,982 $48,507,173
G. (No. of Indemnity Claims) MEDICAL-ONLY Claims H. Medical Benefits I. (No. of Medical-Only Claims) J. Grand Total: Paid Losses
$72,971,713 $67,450,696 $63,871,489 $69,454,417 $58,920,801 $54,716,163 $53,130,319 $56,794,992 $57,667,451
K. Grand Total: No. of Claims L. Average Loss per Indemnity Claim = F/G M. Average Loss per Medical-Only Claim = H/I N. Average Loss per All Self-Insured Claims = J/K
1 Figure 7 indicates the net decrease in premium rates due to premium ratefiling changes in the voluntary and assigned risk markets. Premiums in the year1990 are the basis for the analysis. See Glossary for more definitions ofinsurance terms. 2 See note 1. 3 Statistics are tabulated from annual financial reports submitted to the NationalAssociation of Insurance Commissioners. Self-Insurance coverage is notincluded. 4 See note 3. 5
New Mexico Workers' Compensation Loss Development, Accident Year 1994-2000 Accident Initial Net Loss Ratios Latest Available Latest Available Net Loss Ratios Difference Paid+Case Reserves* Evaluation Date Paid+Case Reserves
Data Source: National Council on Compensation Insurance (Liu, 2002).
* Case Reserves: Funds set aside by claims adjusters to cover future liabilities.
6 The Hartford is the eighth largest workers’ compensation underwriter in theU.S., ranked by written premium. 7 The WCRI estimates on medical and wage replacement costs per indemnityclaim represent cost averages on eight states’ (CA, CT, FL, GA, MA, MN, PA,TX) indemnity claims with over seven days lost work time. These claims aredrawn from a database of 5.5 million claims in accident years 1994-1999. WCRI plans to add data from twelve more states in the near future. WCRIestimates these eight states account for at least 40 percent of all workers’compensation claims filed per year in the U.S. 8 The WCRI estimates on legal costs are based on a subset of claims that havelegal costs from accident years 1996-1999 in eight states (CA, CT, FL, GA,MA, MN, PA, TX). Some of these states require a defense attorney be involvedin preparing a claim (Telles, et al., 2001).
tage of free calls between branch offices located around theworld as well as reduced rate calls to the traditional telephonenetwork. Increased functionality is also added with supplementaryservices such as Call Waiting, Call Hold, Call Resume, CallTransfer and 3-way conference calling. Further you can centrallymanage VoIP user accounts and automatically provision thesesettings to the phone. This