Microsoft word - gender detriments in health plan benefits.doc
Gender Detriments in Health Plan Benefits
Anna C. Naples, Pharm. D. Candidate, UNC-CH Class of 2003
David Work, JD,Executive Director of the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy,
Adjunct Professor at UNC-CH School of Pharmacy
Anna Naples 24 Warbler Lane Durham, NC 27712 Phone 919-593-1199 Fax 919-967-5757 Email-anaples@ncbop.org
Abstract
The Pharmacy Board receives many calls about health plan payments and
from women questioning the coverage of contraceptives, which led to the
comparison of benefits for males and females. In 1999, the North Carolina
General Assembly passed an act requiring that health insurance plans provide
coverage for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved prescription
contraceptive drugs, devices, and related medical examinations if they offer
prescription drug coverage. The act was effective as of January 1, 2000 and
although this act has been effective for almost 2 years, it appears that health plans
have interpreted this act in such a way that still provides little benefit to some
The percent benefit paid by six popular health plans in North Carolina on
10 prescription medications, five of which were commonly used by females and
five of which were commonly used by males were compared.
This study indicates there is significant variability between health plans
and how much benefit they provide their patients. It also indicates that these
benefits differ depending on gender. Three of the six plans examined had higher
benefits for female patients and the other three plans analyzed showed greater
benefits to male patients. If the medications, which were included by the plans
but provided a 0% benefit to the patients, were included in the average benefit
calculations, only one plan provides its female patients with a greater benefit than
Introduction
The Pharmacy Board receives many calls about health plan payments for
drugs even though the Board has no jurisdiction over this subject. Inquiries
include topics such as the extent of benefits, the coverage of brand and generic
drugs, different co-payment amounts and public health concerns over an adequate
number of pharmacies participating in the State Employees Health Plan. Some
women question the coverage of contraceptives, which led to the comparison of
Background
Many people assume that their health plan provides them with fair and
equal prescription drug benefits regardless of their gender. Unfortunately with
some health plans their assumption is incorrect. Although co-pays for brand or
generic medications are the same regardless of gender, the actual benefit paid by
health plans may depend on more than the price of the medication alone. Until
1999, there was no law in North Carolina requiring health plans to cover oral
contraceptives for female patients. However, in 1999, the North Carolina General
Assembly passed an act which requires that many health insurance plans provide
coverage for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved prescription
contraceptive drugs, devices, and related medical examinations if they offer
prescription drug coverage. The act was effective as of January 1, 2000 and
although this act has been effective for almost 2 years, it appears that health plans
have interpreted this act in such a way that still provides little benefit to their
patients. Some health plans increased their co-pays after the act was passed from
$10 to $25. If the product cost to the pharmacy is $29.86 and the pharmacy fee is
$1.50, the overall expense is $31.36. The consumer pays $25 as the co-pay and
the health plan pays the remaining $6.36 to the pharmacy. Therefore, while the
health plans technically cover oral contraceptives, the patient is left with nearly all
of the expense. This may comply with the letter of the law, but certainly not the
intent. This is a slender benefit when the patient’s monthly premium is over $200
per month (State Employees single coverage is $244/month and is publicly
available information). This minimal benefit is very significant because there are
approximately 188,000 female patients compared to approximately 92,000 male
patients on the state health plan. If some plans have increased the cost of oral
contraceptives and decreased their benefit to female consumers, are the other
health plans, likewise, giving lower benefits to females?
Methods: Study Design
The answer was researched by comparing the percent benefit paid by six
popular health plans in North Carolina on 10 prescription medications, five of
which were commonly used by females, and five of which were commonly used
by males. A list of possible drugs targeted to each gender was narrowed down to
cover a wide range of FDA approved indications for each gender and specific
drugs studied were chosen using their FDA labeling.
The six health plans included in the study were selected based on their
patient volume for prescription drugs. Those studied included Blue Advantage by
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Cigna Healthcare of North
Carolina, Partners National Health Plan of North Carolina, United Healthcare of
North Carolina, North Carolina Teachers’ and State Employees’ Major Medical
Five medications were selected as being drugs commonly used by male
patients to include in the evaluation. Androderm® (transdermal testotsterone), is
indicated by the FDA for testosterone replacement therapy in men for conditions
associated with a deficiency or absence of testosterone. The product has not been
evaluated in women and therefore is not recommended for use in women. A 30-
patch supply of the 5 mg strength was used in the study as a 30-day supply unless
otherwise stated. Flomax® (tamsulosin) is indicated for the treatment of the signs
and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or enlarged prostate, but is
not indicated for the treatment of hypertension, and thus is not indicated for use in
women. Thirty dosage units of Flomax® were considered a 30 day supply for the
study unless otherwise stated. Muse® (urethral alprostadil) is a urethral
suppository with FDA indication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. One
box (6 suppositories) of the 125 mcg strength was considered a 30 day supply in
this study unless noted otherwise. Propecia® (finasteride) is for the treatment of
male pattern hair loss (androgenetic alopecia) in men only. Unless otherwise
noted, a 30 days supply was considered to be 30 dosage units of 1 mg for this
study. Viagra® (sildenafil) is FDA indicated for the treatment of erectile
dysfunction and may only be used in men according to FDA indication. For this
study, a 30-day supply was considered 5 dosage units of 50 mg unless otherwise
Five drugs were also selected for the evaluation of benefits to women.
Diflucan® (fluconazole) has FDA indication for the treatment of vaginal
candidiasis (vaginal yeast infections due to Candida), Oropharyngeal and
esophageal candidiasis and Cryptococcal meningitis. The recommend dose for
vaginal candidiasis is 150 mg once and therefore, 4 of these were considered a 30-
day supply unless otherwise noted for this study as women more frequently use
this dose than men. Evista® (raloxifene) is indicated for the treatment and
prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. There is no FDA
indication for its use in men and the risk of suffering a bone fracture due to
osteoporosis over the course of life is about 40% for women, and 13% for men.
Thirty dosage units of Evista® were considered a 30-day supply for the purpose
of this study unless otherwise noted. Nolvadex® (tamoxifen) is indicated for the
treatment of metastatic breast cancer in women and men, to reduce the incidence
of breast cancer and to treat other related diseases. A 30-day supply of thirty, 20
mg dosage units of the medication in a generic equivalent was used in this study
unless otherwise specified. Ortho Tri-Cyclen® (ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate) is
FDA indicated for the prevention of pregnancy in women who elect to use oral
contraceptives as a method of contraception and for the treatment of moderate
acne vulgaris in females, ≥ 15 years of age, who have no known contraindications
to oral contraceptive therapy, desire contraception, have achieved menarche, and
are unresponsive to topical anti-acne medications. One pack of 28 pills was
considered a 30-day supply unless otherwise noted for this study. Premarin®
(conjugated estrogens) is indicated for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms
associated with menopause, vaginitis, kraurosis vulvae, female hypo-gonadism,
primary ovarian failure, breast cancer palliation, palliation prosthetic carcinoma,
postpartum breast engorgement, abnormal uterine bleeding due to hormonal
imbalance in the absence of organic pathology. For this study, a 30-day supply
was considered 30 dosage units of the 0.625mg strength unless otherwise stated.
Please refer to Table 1. To calculate the benefit provided by each health
plan on the ten medications, the payment made by the health plan was divided by
the total charge for each prescription. The total charge was calculated using the
amount accepted by the health plan as the cost of the medication plus the fee paid
to the pharmacy by the health plan for each dispensing of a prescription. The
payment made by the health plan was calculated by subtracting the co-pay paid by
the patient from the total charge for each prescription.
Not every product was covered by every health plan reviewed. Some
plans, while not declining to cover the medication, provided no benefit to the
patient. Many plans also decreased their benefit by limiting the amount of
United Healthcare of North Carolina did not cover Propecia®. Due to
this, the benefit would actually be 0%, however since the product was listed as not
covered, it was not included in the average. They limited the number of
Diflucan® dispensed to 1 tablet each time, therefore the benefit was calculated
using the cost and co-pay for 1 tablet. Although the drug product was not listed
as not covered United Healthcare patients are required to pay the total charge of
their Diflucan® as their co-pay. Because the benefit was 0, it was not included in
the average. If the 0% benefit was included in the average since the product was
listed as covered, however, the benefit would be only 45.9% for female patients.
State Employees did not cover Muse®, Propecia® or Viagra®, and
therefore these were benefits of 0% and were not included in the average.
Premarin® had a percent benefit of 0 however it was not listed as not covered by
the health plan. The benefit of zero was not included in the average. However,
including the benefit of 0% brings the average down to 40.7% for female patients
The Partners plan did not cover Muse®, Propecia® or Viagra® and these
were not included in the average percent benefit calculations. The plan limited
Diflucan® to 2 tablets per dispensing and therefore the calculations were made on
only 2 tablets. Partners did not cover the generic equivalent for Nolvadex®,
tamoxifen, however they did cover the brand name product and the calculations
were based on the cost and co-pay for the brand name medication.
Cigna Healthcare also did not cover Muse®, Propecia® or Viagra® and
none of these were included in the average benefit. Diflucan® was limited to 2
tablets per dispensing and the percent benefit reflects the calculations based on 2
tablets. Patients with the Cigna plan were required to pay the total charge of their
Ortho Tri-Cyclen® as well as the 2 tablets allowed for Diflucan® and therefore
the benefit was 0, however this was not calculated into the average percent
benefit. The average benefit to female patients with Cigna Health plans drops to
33.9% when the 0% benefits are included.
The Blue Advantage plan required patients to pay the total charge of their
Propecia®, Diflucan®, and Premarin ® therefore, these prescriptions had a zero
percent benefit and was not calculated into the average percent benefit. Only 4
Viagra® tablets were allowed per month and only 4 Muse® suppositories were
covered. If the prescriptions that had a zero percent benefit were included in the
average, the average benefit for women becomes 25.5% and the benefit for men
Conclusion
This study shows there is significant variability between different health
plans and how much benefit they provide to their patients. It also indicates that
these benefits are different depending on gender. Two of the five plans examined
had higher benefits for the female patients. While Cigna showed a small
difference of 4.2% between the genders, Partners had a difference of 10.2%. The
other three plans included in the showed greater benefits to the male patients.
United Healthcare showed benefits that were 1.4% higher for males, which was
the most fair according to this study. NC Medicaid had a 2.1% difference in favor
of male patients. State Teacher’s and Employees was 14.8% different between
the genders favoring the males. Blue Advantage was 25.5% different between the
If the medications which were included by the plans but provided a 0%
benefit to the patients were included, only Partners provides its female patients
with a greater benefit than its male patients. There is an 18.5% decrease for
female patients under the Cigna plan, a 12.9% decrease for females with United
Healthcare, and a 24.9% disadvantage to State Employee covered females. Male
patients have a 7.7% decrease and female patients have a 38.3% decrease for the
Acknowledgments
Deborah Ross, House of Representatives, NC General Assembly, Rebecca W. Chater, RPh, MPH, FAPhA, Betty H. Dennis, BS, MS, PhramD
References www.ncga.state.nc.us www.Viagra.com- www.Propecia.com www.vivus.com www.flomax-bph.com www.androderm.com www.diflucan.com www.who.int www.nolvadex.com www.ortho-mcneil.com Disclaimer
The text in this article is that of the author’s alone. This material is not a resolution, position or statement of the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy. Reprint Address Anna C. Naples 24 Warbler Lane Durham, NC 27712 Not covered Not covered Not covered Not covered 52.4 61.9 58.9 65.6 95.5 50.35 40.3** 93.4 63.8 45.9** 40.66**
Benefit Comparisons Table 1. Percent benefits by health plan, averages by gender included excluding 0% benefits. * This means that 84.9% of the total charge was paid by the Health Plan ** Average including 0% benefits.
P o i n t d ’ i n f o r m a t i o n Utilisation du baclofène dans le traitement de l’alcoolo-dépendance : actualisation De nouvelles données relatives à l’utilisation et à la sécurité d’emploi du baclofène (Lioresal et générique) dans le traitement de l’alcoolo-dépendance conduisent l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Afssaps)
38 PHARMACOTHERAPY Tan Chay Hoon Introduction With the availability of numerous drugs for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, it can sometimes be difficult to choose from amongst them. Therefore, the rationale of prescribing has to be based on: 1. Patient’s profile, e.g. age, underlying medical problems, previous history of drug response and allergy; and A Anxiolytics