Brazilian Journal of Microbiology (2007) 38:599-602ISSN 1517-8382
ISOLATION OF SHIGA TOXIGENIC ESCHERICHIA COLI FROM BUTCHERIES IN TAQUARITINGA CITY, STATE OF SÃO PAULO, BRAZIL Daniela Rodolpho1; José Moacir Marin2*
1Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias de Jaboticabal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP, Brasil;
2Departamento de Morfologia, Estomatologia e Fisiologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade
de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
Submitted: January 3, 2007; Returned to authors for corrections: May 31, 2007; Approved: September 28, 2007. ABSTRACT
Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) has been implicated as the cause of several human diseases. Samples(ground beef, grinding-machines and human hands) from 23 butcheries were assayed for E. coli usingstandard microbiological methods, and 287 isolates were submitted to polymerase chain reaction for thedetection of stx 1, stx 2 and eae genes. Four STEC isolates were recovered, two from ground beef and two fromgrinding-machines; all harbored the stx 2 gene and were negative for the eae gene. All E. coli isolatesincluding the four STEC were screened for antibiotic resistance. High levels of resistance against severalantimicrobial agents were detected; those most commonly observed were to tetracycline (76.6%), amoxicillin(64.1%) and cephalothin (58.8%). Such high levels of antimicrobial resistance highlight the need for a morerational use of these agents in cattle. Key words:Escherichia coli, STEC, stx 2, antibiotic resistance, ground beef, cattle INTRODUCTION
1 (Stx 1) and Shiga Toxin 2 (Stx 2). Although different proteins,encoded by different genes (stx 1 and stx 2, respectively), they
Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) has been
have similar biological activities (18). Strains possessing stx 2
implicated as the cause of several human diseases including
are potentially more virulent than those carrying stx 1 or even
mild or severe bloody diarrhea (hemorrhagic colitis), hemolytic
strains carrying both stx 1 and stx 2 (3,16). Another virulence
syndrome (HUS) and renal failure (10,22). The STEC strain most
factor, intimin (eae) is encoded in a pathogenicity island called
frequently associated with clinical disease in the United States
LEE (locus of enterocyte effacement). LEE-encoded genes
and Europe is the serotype O157:H7 (4,16). However, several
appear to enhance STEC virulence and have been associated
other serotypes have been associated with severe disease
outbreaks, and in some countries they have been isolated from
Antimicrobial agents for therapy or prophylaxis aimed at
clinical cases more often than O157 (13,16). Cattle is considered
animal growth promotion, have favored propagation of resistant
the primary reservoir of both O157 and non-O157 STEC bacteria
bacteria (27). Intestinal resistant bacteria due to fecal
(2). Several human infections have been linked to STEC in
contamination during slaughtering may be transferred to meat
undercooked ground beef (10). During processing, fecal
products (6). If subsequently transmitted to human food (27),
contamination of the carcass or transfer of bacteria found on
the animal hide to the carcass could facilitate transmission of
This study is aimed at the determination of STEC occurrence
in ground beef and the characterization of antimicrobial
Pathogenic STEC strains known to produce one or two toxins
resistance of E. coli isolated from ground beef, meat-grinding
resembling those from Shigella dysenteriae (19), are Shiga Toxin
machines and hands of meat manipulators.
*Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Morfologia, Estomatologia e Fisiologia, FORP- Via do Café S/N, Campus USP, 14040-904 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil. Tel.: +55-16-36024101 Fax: +55-16-36330999. E-mail: jmmarin@forp.usp.br
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Standards (17), using commercial disks (Cefar, SãoPaulo, Brazil), loaded as follows: nalidixic acid (30 µg), amikacin
Sampling
(30 µg), amoxicillin (10 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 µg),
Meat samples and swabs from grinding-machines and hands
ampicillin (10 µg), cephalothin (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg),
of meat manipulators were collected on separate occasions,
ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), streptomycin (10
over a 10-month period (March 2004 to January 2005), from
µg), gentamicin (10 µg) and tetracycline (30 µg). E. coli reference
twenty-three butcheries in Taquaritinga, a city in the northwest
strains ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35218 were used for strain quality
of the State of São Paulo. Samples were kept on ice between
collection and testing. On the same day of collection, 25gsamples of ground meat were homogenized by hand in 225 ml of
sterile 0.1% (wt/vol) peptone water (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke,Hampshire, UK), in a stomacher bag, for 5-10 min. Swabs from
Among 287 E. coli isolates submitted to PCR to detect stx 1,
machines or hands of operators were manually mixed with 10 ml
stx 2 and eae genes, four STEC strains were isolated. Two of
of 0.1% peptone water. One ml samples from each suspension
them were from the same butchery (ground beef and grinding-
were diluted in 9 ml of lauryl sodium sulfate broth (Difco
machine) and the remaining two (one from ground beef and one
Laboratories, Detroit, USA) and incubated for 24-48h at 35ºC.
from a grinding-machine) were from two different stores (Table
One hundred µl samples from tubes showing bacterial growth
1). All isolates carried the stx 2 gene and were negative for the
were added to 5 ml of Brilliant Green broth (Difco) or EC broth
(Difco) and incubated as above. Ten µl of the broths positive
Antibiotic resistance patterns of the isolates (n=287) are
for coliform growth were plated on Eosin Metylene Blue (EMB-
presented in Table 2. Isolates presenting intermediary resistance
Difco) agar and incubated for 24h at 35°C. At least five colonies
were also classified as resistant. The most frequent resistances
were taken from the EMB plates for further identification (7).
were to tetracycline, amoxicillin, cephalothin and streptomycin. Resistances to amoxicillin + clavulanic acid and ceftriaxone were
Determination of stx genes
rare. Thirty (10.4%) isolates were sensitive to all antibiotics
E. coli isolates were grown overnight in nutrient broth
(Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, USA) at 37ºC, and tested for stx
Resistance to at least three drugs was found in 67.0% of the
genes (stx 1 and stx 2) using the polymerase chain reaction
isolates and 22.0% were resistant to more than 6 antibiotics.
(PCR) protocol of Orden et al. (20). DNA templates were
The resistance patterns of the STEC isolates are presented in
prepared by pelleting 1 ml of each culture by centrifugation
Table 3. One of the isolates (strain 530) was resistant to 7
(12000xg), ressuspension in 250µl of sterile distilled water and
antibiotics; another (strain 426) was susceptible to all drugs.
boiling for 10 min. After centrifugation, supernatants were usedfor PCR in an Eppendorf Mastercycler (Eppendorf AG,Hamburg, Germany). The amplified DNA products were
Table 1. Isolation of STEC from butcheries in Taquaritinga city,
separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel, stained with
ethidium bromide and detected under ultraviolet light.
Reference E. coli strains used as controls were EDL 933
(O157:H7, stx1, stx 2, eae) and DH5α (negative control). Characterisation of isolates
Isolates were confirmed as stx+ and tested for accessory
virulence marker (eae) using the PCR protocol of China et al. (5). O157 latex agglutination DISCUSSION
STEC isolates were serotyped for the O serotype O157
using the O157 Latex Agglutination test kit (Oxoid,
STEC strains are part of the microbiota of the gastrointestinal
Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK). The EDL 933 strain was used
tract of cattle raised for meat consumption. Transfer of fecal
as a positive control. Strains negative for agglutination were
material to carcasses at slaughter leads to potential
contamination of raw meat (6), as also does cross-contaminationof meat and processing equipment (1). Antibiotic susceptibility tests
All STEC isolated in this study carried the stx 2 gene, in
STEC and non-STEC isolates were submitted to the disk
agreement with Brazilian (11,14) and Argentinean reports (21)
diffusion method according to National Committee for Clinical
showing that stx 2 is more frequent than stx 1 in cattle. Absence
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance of 287 E. coli isolates recovered
from a meat-grinding machine. This is a matter of concern
from ground beef, grinding-machines and hands of meat
because unsatisfactory cleaning of meat grinders have been
manipulators in 23 butcheries in a Taquaritinga city, State of
proven to be a source of contamination during processing (1,8).
Warriner et al. (26) demonstrated that the same clone of E. coliwas isolated from a pork carcass and from the equipment used
The emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance
among E. coli, especially STEC strains from cattle, may have
potentially negative clinical implications for humans. Thus
continued surveillance of emerging antimicrobial resistance
among zoonotic food-borne pathogens, including STEC is
required to ensure public health protection. Although STEC
O157: H7 had been considered sensitive to many antibiotics
(24), recent results demonstrated resistance of STEC O157:H7,
and in special the non-O157 STEC strains (9,12). Results of
antimicrobial susceptibility testing (Table 2) showed high
resistance to tetracycline, cephalothin, amoxicillin and
streptomycin. These findings agree with data from previous
studies showing that resistance is common among strains
isolated from food, animals and meat (23,25).
Despite of low number of non-O157 STEC strains isolated in
*Isolates presenting full and intermediary resistance were combined
the present study (n = 4) some of these strains (Table 3) were
resistant to four or more antibiotics, in agreement with the recentreport of Mora et al. (15), who described that among 581 non-O157 STEC strains, 239 (41.0%) were resistant to at least one of
Table 3. Resistance patterns of the four STEC isolates recovered
the antibiotics tested. These authors detected multiple
resistance in 71 strains, which were resistant to five or more
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in food may be a source of
resistance genes transferable to human intestinal microbiota
(28). Control strategies should therefore be introduced by
veterinary authorities to safeguard public health.
*-amox- amoxicillin; nalid- nalidixic acid; ceph- cephalothin; tet-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
tetracycline; cipro- ciprofloxacin; amik- amikacin; amp- ampicillin. **- Susceptible to all tested antibiotics.
The authors thank Tania Marques da Silva for technical
assistance. Financial support was from FAPESP.
or rarity of the eae gene in STEC isolates coincides with earlier
reports (11,14). Absence of serotype O157: H7 in STEC isolatesis not unexpected; it is extremely rare (0.6%) in Brazilian cattle
Isolamento de Escherichia coli Shiga toxigênica em
(11). Interestingly, two recovered isolates did not express stxaçougues na cidade de Taquaritinga, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil
Hussein and Bollinger (10), in a review of the prevalence of
STEC in beef, reported prevalence of non-O157 STEC ranging
Escherichia coli Shiga toxigênica (STEC) tem sido
between 1.7% and 58.0% in samples from packing plants and
responsabilizada como o agente etiológico de diversas doenças
between 3.0% and 62.5% in supermarket samples; the USA,
nos seres humanos. Neste estudo foram analisadas amostras
England, Canada and India showed the highest frequencies on
provenientes de 23 açougues (carne moída, moedor de carne e
isolation. In the present study, we found 1.3%, a value lower
mãos de manipuladores) visando o isolamento de cepas de E.coli utilizando os métodos microbiológicos tradicionais. Um
Two of the STEC isolates, strains 393 and 426, were recovered
total de 287 cepas de E. coli, isoladas destas amostras, foram
from the same butchery, one from ground beef and the other
submetidas a reação em cadeia da polimerase para a detecção
dos genes stx 1, stx 2 e eae. Foram identificadas 4 cepas STEC,
12. Khan, A.; Das, S.C.; Ramamurthy, T.; Sikdar, A.; Khanam, J.;
2 provenientes de carne moída e 2 provenientes do moedor de
Yamasaki, S.; Takeda, Y.; Balakrish Nair, G. (2002). Antibioticresistance, virulence gene and molecular profiles of Shiga Toxin-
carne, todas as cepas apresentando o gene stx 2 e negativas
producing Escherichia coli isolates from diverse sources in Calcutta,
para a presença do gene eae. Todas as cepas de E. coli, incluindo
India. J. Clin. Microbiol.,40, 2009-2015.
as 4 cepas STEC, foram examinadas para verificar a resistência
13. Law, D. (2000). Virulence factors of Escherichia coli O157 and
antimicrobiana. Foram detectados altos níveis de resistência a
other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. J. Appl. Microbiol.,88,729-745.
diferentes agentes antimicrobianos, sendo as resistências mais
14. Lira, M.W.; Macedo, C.; Marin, J.M. (2004). The incidence of Shiga
elevadas para a tetraciclina (76,6%), amoxicilina (64,1%) e
toxin-producing Escherichia coli in cattle with mastitis in Brazil. J.
cefalotina (58,8%). Estes altos índices de resistência ressaltam
Appl. Microbiol.,97, 861-866.
a necessidade de uma utilização mais racional destes agentes
15. Mora, A.; Blanco, J.E.; Blanco, M.; Alonso Pilar, M.; Dhabi, G.;
Echeita, A.; Gonzalez, E.A.; Bernardez, M.I.; Blanco, J. (2005).
Antimicrobial resistance of Shiga toxin (verotoxin)-producingEscherichia coli O157: H7 and non-O157 strains isolated from
Palavras-chave: Escherichia coli, STEC, stx 2, resistência a
humans, cattle, sheep and food in Spain. Res. Microbiol.,156,793-
16. Nataro, J.P.; Kaper, J.B. (1998). Diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.,11, 142-201. REFERENCES
17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. (2000). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests,
Aslam, M.; Greer, G.G.; Nattress, F.M.; Gill, C.O.; McMulen, L.M. seventh ed.,Approved Standard M2-A7. Comm. Clin. Lab. Stand.,
(2004). Genotypic analysis of Escherichia coli recovered from
product and equipment at a beef-packing plant. J. Appl. Microbiol.,
18. Neil, M.A. (1997). Overview of Verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J.Food Prot.,60,1444-1446.
Bettelheim, K.A. (2000). Role of non-O157 VTEC. J. Appl.
19. O’Brien, A.D.; Holmes, R.K. (1987). Shiga and Shiga-like toxins. Microbiol.,88, 38S-50S. Microbiol. Ver.,51,206-220.
Boerlin, P.; McEwen, S.A.; Boerlin-Petzold, F.; Wilson, J.B.; Johnson,
20. Orden, J.A.; Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria, J.A.; Cid, D.; Garcia, S.; Sanz, R.;
R.P.; Gyles, C.L. (1999). Association between virulence factors of
de la Fuente, R. (1998). Verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC)
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and disease in humans. J.
and eae-positive non-VTEC in 1-30-days-old diarrhoeic dairy calves. Clin. Microbiol.,37, 497-503. Vet. Microbiol.,63, 239-248.
Caprioli, A.; Morabito, S.; Brugere, H.; Oswald, E. (2005).
21. Padola, N.L.; Sanz, M.E.; Blanco, J.E.; Blanco, M.; Blanco, J.;
Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichiacoli: emerging issues on virulence
Etcherria, A.I.; Arroyo, G.H.; Usera, M.A.; Parma, A.E. (2004).
and modes of transmission. Vet. Res.,36, 289-311.
Serotypes and virulence genes of bovine Shigatoxigenic Escherichia
China, B.; Pirson, V.; Mainil, J. (1996). Typing of bovine attaching
coli (STEC) isolated from a feedlot in Argentina. Vet. Microbiol.,
and effacing Escherichiacoli by multiplex in vitro amplification of
virulence-associated genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,62, 3462-
22. Paton, J.C.; Paton, A.W. (1998). Pathogenesis and diagnosis of
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Clin. Microbiol.
Elder, R.O.; Keen, J.E.; Siragusa, G.R.; Barkocy-Gallagher, G.A.;
Koohmaraie, M.; Laegreid, W.W. (2000). Correlation of
23. Sáenz, Y.; Zarazaga, M.; Brinas, L.; Lantero, M.; Ruiz-Larrea, F.;
enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 prevalence in feces, hides,
Torres, C. (2001). Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli isolates
and carcasses of beef cattle during processing. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
obtained from animals, foods and humans in Spain. Int. J. Antimicrob.
Farmer, J.J. (1999). Enterobacteriacea: Introduction and
24. Schmidt, H.; von Maldeghem, J.; Frosch, M.; Karch, H. (1998). Identification. In: Murray, P.R., Baron, E.J., Phaler, M.A., Tenover,
Antibiotic susceptibilities of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia
F.C., Yolken, R.H., (Eds). Man. Clin. Microbiol.,7 ed., ASM,
coli O157 and non-O157 during 1996. J. Antimicrob. Chemother,
Farrel, A.B.; Ronner, A.B.; Wong, A.C.I. (1998). Attachment of
25. Schroeder, C.M.; White, D.G.; Ge, B.; Zhang, Y.; McDermott, P.F.;
Escherichia coli O157: H7 in ground beef to meat grinders and
Ayers, S.; Zhao, S.; Meng, J. (2003). Isolation of antimicrobial-
survival after sanitation with chorine and peroxyacetic acid. J. Food
resistant Escherichia coli from retail meats purchased in Greater
Washington, DC, USA. Int. J. Food Microbiol.,85, 197-202.
Galland, J.C.; Hyatt, D.R.; Crupper, SS.; Acheson, D.W. (2001).
26. Warriner, K.; Aldsworth, T.G.; Kaur, S.; Dodd, C.E.E. (2002). Cross-
Prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility, and diversity of Escherichia
contamination of carcasses and equipment during pork processing. coli O157: H7 isolates from a longitudinal study of beef feedlots. J. Appl. Microbiol.,93, 169-177. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,67, 1619-1627.
27. White, D.G.; Zhao, S.; Simjee, S.; Wagner, D.D.; McDermott, P.F.
10. Hussein, H.S.; Bollinger, L.M. (2005). Prevalence of Shiga toxin-
(2002). Antimicrobial resistance of foodborne pathogens. Microb.
producing Escherichia coli in beef. Meat Sci.,71, 676-689.
11. Irino, K.; Kato, M.A.M.F.; Vaz, T.M.M.I.; Ramos, I.I.; Souza, M.A.C.;
28. Winokur, P.L.; Vonstein, D.L.; Hoffman, L.J.; Uhlenhopp, E.K.;
Cruz, A.S.; Gomes, T.A.T.; Vieira, M.A.M.; Guth, B.E.C. (2005).
Doern, G.V. (2001). Evidence for transfer of CMY-2 AmpC β-
Serotypes and virulence markers of Shiga toxin-producing
lactamase plasmids between Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates
Escherichia coli (STEC) isolated from dairy cattle in São Paulo
from food animals and humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,45,
State, Brazil. Vet. Microbiol.,105, 29-36.
PSY (053) Style Guidelines* Psychiatric Pharmacy Person References Generally, use third person present tense or passive tense wording Professional is “psychiatric pharmacist” but is not routinely mentioned in items Person served is the “patient”: a 25-year-old patient Research “participant” not “subject” for humans; but “animal subject” OK Use “individual(
This article was downloaded by: [Wernik, Uri]On: 28 April 2009Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 910688047]Publisher RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UKMental Health, Religion & CulturePublication details, including instructions for authors and subscripti